Observations on a children's book
Aug. 18th, 2002 03:14 amAs I've posted several times previously, I've been collecting various Oz books that came after L. Frank Baum's original 14.
Ruth Plumly Thompson wrote the next 19. I read "The Royal Book of Oz" last week (#15, her first Oz book, based on notes made by Baum). It's an enjoyable read, but of course Thompson was already a well-known children's author when she agreed to start writing Oz books.
After 19 books, she decided to step down as official "Royal Historian" of Oz in 1939. (She later wrote two more Oz books, in the 70's). At this point, 32 of the 33 Oz books had been illustrated by John R. Neill (all but the original), and so the publishers asked him to write an Oz book.
Neill wrote 4 Oz books, but the fourth was not illustrated or published until 1995, when Eric Shanower edited the manuscript, illustrated it, and published it. The last few days I've been reading the first of these, officially known as Oz book #34, "The Wonder City of Oz". And, as one reviewer I read put it, it's clear that drawing is Neill's strength, and not writing. But on several levels, this is also an entertaining book.
( more behind the sekrit link )
Ruth Plumly Thompson wrote the next 19. I read "The Royal Book of Oz" last week (#15, her first Oz book, based on notes made by Baum). It's an enjoyable read, but of course Thompson was already a well-known children's author when she agreed to start writing Oz books.
After 19 books, she decided to step down as official "Royal Historian" of Oz in 1939. (She later wrote two more Oz books, in the 70's). At this point, 32 of the 33 Oz books had been illustrated by John R. Neill (all but the original), and so the publishers asked him to write an Oz book.
Neill wrote 4 Oz books, but the fourth was not illustrated or published until 1995, when Eric Shanower edited the manuscript, illustrated it, and published it. The last few days I've been reading the first of these, officially known as Oz book #34, "The Wonder City of Oz". And, as one reviewer I read put it, it's clear that drawing is Neill's strength, and not writing. But on several levels, this is also an entertaining book.
( more behind the sekrit link )